Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Contents
Isauro Aguirre had contact with Gabriel when the latter went to live with his mother, Pearl. Aguirre and Pearl began torturing Gabriel because they believed he was gay. The torture escalated to the point where Aguirre forced Gabriel to eat cat feces in addition to physical abuse.
Although Aguirre had no criminal record and appeared to be a decent man based on reports from social workers, he began to deteriorate after coming into contact with Pearl. It has been suggested that Aguirre’s intellectual disabilities and learning difficulties may have made him susceptible to Pearl’s influence. His sister and former girlfriends testified that he was caring and helpful in the past, and his former employer spoke positively about him as well.
Despite his past reputation, Aguirre’s actions towards Gabriel make him a living monster. While one could debate the merits of capital punishment, it is clear that Aguirre deserves the harshest punishment possible.
Gabriel suffered unimaginable abuse and torture that ultimately led to his death. This tragic case highlights the long-lasting impact of trauma on children and the need for society to invest in resources to support children who have experienced abuse, neglect, or other forms of trauma.
Isauro Aguirre is presently incarcerated on death row at California’s San Quentin State Prison. During the trial, Aguirre did not display any remorse for his actions. He avoided making eye contact, did not shed any tears, and kept rolling his hands. He received the death penalty for murder and murder by torture and was sent to San Quentin State Prison in California on June 13, 2018. Aguirre is currently 39 years old and has a condemned status. However, due to ongoing legal disputes over capital punishment in California, it could be months or even years before he is executed.
Despite Aguirre’s past reputation, public opinion was heavily against him following Gabriel’s death. People were outraged by his heinous actions and demanded justice. Even though there were some positive things said about him during the trial, it did not change the fact that he committed a terrible crime and deserved his sentencing. A Facebook group advocating for justice for Gabriel highlights the intense hatred many people feel towards Aguirre for what he did to the innocent boy.
Yes, Isauro Aguirre is still alive. Really, it is impossible to imagine how he is able to kill an eight-year-old boy. Gabriel Fernandez suffered abuse and torture for months before his death, and despite reports to social services and law enforcement, he was not protected. This tragedy underscores the need for better training for professionals who work with children, such as teachers and healthcare workers, to recognize signs of child abuse and neglect and report them promptly.
Gabriel’s case was reported to social services multiple times, but he was left in the care of his mother and her boyfriend. This shows the danger of ignoring reports of abuse and the importance of taking them seriously, investigating them thoroughly, and taking swift action to protect the child.
Isauro Aguirre was held accountable for his actions and was sentenced to death for his role in Gabriel’s murder. This serves as a reminder that justice is important for victims and their families, and for society as a whole.
The date of his execution has not been announced yet. After being found guilty of the murder of Gabriel Fernandez, Isauro Aguirre received the death penalty on June 13, 2018, and was immediately admitted to San Quentin State Prison. Aguirre, a 39-year-old resident of Palmdale, California, has been on death row since then.
According to ABC7, some of these criminals have been on death row since the 1970s. The number of annual executions has significantly declined since 1983, when Michael Angelo Morales challenged the procedure’s inhumanity. The last execution in California was that of Clarence Ray Allen, who received a lethal injection on January 17, 2006. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has suspended all executions until a new decision regarding their legality is reached. As a result, Isauro Aguirre’s fate is ultimately determined by the relevant authorities.
The prosecutor in Aguirre’s trial argued that Gabriel was tortured because Aguirre and Pearl Fernandez believed he was gay. This highlights the devastating consequences of discrimination and the need for society to work towards greater acceptance and understanding of all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
In 2013, Pearl Fernandez and her boyfriend Isauro Aguirre brutally murdered her son Gabriel Fernandez in their California home. Pearl is currently serving a life sentence at the Central California Women’s Facility after being sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. In 2018, Pearl pled guilty to first-degree murder and murder involving torture, but avoided the death penalty. However, her expressions of remorse were rejected by the judge who called her actions “horrendous and inhumane and nothing short of evil.”
During the trial, jurors heard how Gabriel was subjected to torture and abuse by his mother and her boyfriend, after being placed in their care eight months prior to his death. The abuse included beatings, being forced to eat cat litter and feces, being shot with a BB gun, and more. Gabriel’s siblings, who Pearl also shared with his father Arnold Contreras, were also abused, but not to the same extent as Gabriel. Deputy District Attorney Jonathan Hatami believed that Pearl and Aguirre tortured Gabriel because they thought he was gay.
On the day of Gabriel’s murder, he was beaten by Pearl and Aguirre for not cleaning up his toys. Aguirre was sentenced to death for his role in the murder, but his execution date has not been set due to California’s moratorium on capital punishment.
TRENDING
Disclaimer: The above information is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information on the Site.